Max Weber was born and died
Charismatic domination Charismatic authority grows out of the personal charm or the strength of an individual personality.
Thus, according to Weber, it is particularly difficult for charismatic leaders to maintain their authority because the followers must continue to legitimize the authority of the leader. Charismatic domination is insofar different from legal-rational and traditional power as it does not develop from established tradition but rather from the belief the followers have in the leader.
According to Weber, once the leader loses his charisma or dies, systems based on charismatic authority tend to transform into traditional or legal-rational systems. Traditional domination In traditional authority, the legitimacy of the authority comes from tradition or custom; Weber described it as "the authority of the eternal yesterday" and identified it as the source of authority for monarchies.
The dominant individual could be a clan leader, eldest, the head of a family, a patriarchal figure or dominant elite. Historically this has been the most common type of government.
According to Weber, inequalities are created and preserved by traditional authority. Should this authority not be challenged, the dominant leader or group will stay in power.
For Weber, traditional power blocked the development of rational-legal authority. Legal domination Legal authority, also known as rational-legal authority, is where an individual or institution exerts power by virtue of the legal office that they hold.
It is the authority that demands obedience to the office rather than the officeholder; once they leave office, their rational-legal authority is lost. Weber identified "rationally-created rules"  as the central feature of this form of authority. Modern democracies contain many examples of legal-rational regimes.
There are different ways in which legal authority can develop. Many societies have developed a system of laws and regulations and there exist many different principles of legality. With the development of a legal-rational system, the political system is likely to be rationalized similarly.
Constitutionswritten documents, established offices and regular elections are often associated with modern legal-rational political systems. These in the past have tended to develop in opposition to earlier traditional systems such as monarchies, where the set of rules are not well developed.
As these systems develop in a rational manner, authority takes on a legal-rational form. Those who govern have the legitimate legal right to do so and those subordinated accept the legality of the rulers.
Albeit rational-legal authority may be challenged by those subordinated, it is unlikely to result in a quick change in the nature of the system.Max Weber defined rational legal authority (also called bureaucratic authority) as "power legitimized by legally enacted rules and regulations" Max Weber viewed bureaucracy as a type of organization that dominates in rational thinking, modern societies.
Max Weber’s Charisma CHRISTOPHER ADAIR-TOTEFFMississippi State University, USA ABSTRACTScholars have concentrated on Max Weber’s notions of traditional and bureaucratic authority because these ﬁgure prominently in his lifelong concern with the rise of Western rationality.
Introduction: How Story was Stolen from Charismatic Leadership In the beginning there was Max Weber's () story of charismatic leaders, heroes that transformed and changed the world, until they were ousted or succeeded by bureaucratic or traditional srmvision.com MacGregor Burns () studied Weber and reasoned that transactional leaders were like the bureaucrats, and charismatic heroic.
Weber thought the best example of legal-rational authority was a bureaucracy (political or economic). This form of authority is frequently found in the modern state, city governments, private and public corporations, and various voluntary associations. Max Weber treated every type of this quality in his theory for explanation whether it is unenthusiastic or Enthusiastic.
He also included intellectual, and Heroes (such as Alexander the Great etc.). Charismatic authority is different from bureaucratic and traditional authority in performing the everyday routine and the profane sphere. Oct 06, · To Max Weber, authority, power and control were different to each other.
To him, if one succeeds in imposing his will in a social relationship, despite resistance then only it can be said that the person has ‘power’.